INFO CENTER« Cases and Current Investigations
Municipal DerivativesIn re: Municipal Derivatives Antitrust Litigation
MDL 1950, U.S.D.C., Southern District of New York May 2014
Hausfeld LLP was appointed co-lead cousel in this nationwide class action lawsuit against banks, insurance companies, and brokers alleging widespread price-fixing and bid rigging in the multi-billion dollar municipal derivatives industry dating back to 1992. The proposed class is represented by Hausfeld LLP and other co-lead counsel. To date, co-lead counsel have obtained settlements in excess of $120 million on behalf of the class from five defendants (two of which are pending final approval in June 2014).
The plaintiffs and the class they seek to represent are state, local, and municipal governments and their agencies, as well as private entities, that purchased municipal derivatives from or through any of the following defendants: AIG Financial Products Corp.; AIG SunAmerica Life Assurance Co.; GE Funding Capital Market Services, Inc.; Genworth Financial Inc.; JP Morgan Chase & Co.; Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc.; Société Générale SA; UBS AG; Lehman Brothers Inc.; Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc.; Morgan Stanley; Wachovia bank N.A.; Natixis S.A.; Financial Security Assurance Holdings, Ltd.; Financial Guaranty Insurance Company; Trinity Funding Co. LLC; Piper Jaffray & Co.; Security Capital Assurance Inc.; XL Asset Funding Compnay LLC; XL Life Insurance & Annuity, Inc.; National Westminster Bank plc; or Bank of America N.A.
Municipals derivatives are used to invest the proceeds of municipal bonds. Because municipal bonds commonly fund multi-year public works projects, most of their proceeds cannot be spent immediately, and must be invested to earn interest until they are ripe for use. These investment vehicles are known as municipal derivatives, an umbrella term tha trefers to various tax-exempt vehicles, including guaranteed investment contracts, advance refunding escrows, swaps, toptions, swaptions, collars, and floors. As a result of this conspiracy, the plaintiffs and other class members were deprived of extra money they otherwise would have received from their municipal bond investments and could have spent on important public works projects such as roads, buildings, and mass transit.
The lawsuits come on the heels of an investigation by the United States Department of Justice's Antitrust Division, the Internal Revenue Service, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and certain State Attorney Generals into industry-wide collusive practices in the two-hundred year old municipal bond industry. The lawsuits also follow Bank of America's conditional acceptance into the Antitrust Division's amnesty program, in connection with which there was disclosure of information regarding the conspiracy described below and the promise to provide full and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division and the plaintiffs and the class they seek to represent.
For more information, please contact Megan E. Jones.
Practice Areas: Antitrust / Competition
» Second Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint
» 4/30/09 Order on Motion to Dismiss (PDF)
» 3/25/10 Order on Motion to Dismiss (PDF)
» 5/11/11 Hearing Transcript (PDF)
» Motion and Memorandum in Support of Class Plaintiffs' Motion to Seek Relief Related to Select State Attorney Generals' Proposed Notice (Redacted) (PDF)
» Class Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Seek Relief Related to Select State Attorney Generals' Proposed Notice (PDF)
» 6/10/11 Letter to the Court from Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority regarding State Agreement (PDF)
» 4/13/11 Letter to the Court from Class Plaintiffs regarding State Agreement with BoA (PDF)
» 5/9/11 Letter to the Court from Class Plaintiffs regarding State Agreement with UBS (PDF)
» 7/8/11 Letter to the Court from Class Plaintiffs regarding State Agreement with JP Morgan (PDF)